Emmanuel Krasner

I oppose this bill because it is fundamentally flawed in that is uses public funds to pay for private services. Beyond the basic flaw, it is fiscally irresponsible. The program is already wildly overspent. There is no upper limit to its cost which means that more and more money will come from the state's public funds reducing the amount of state aid to local districts and putting an ever greater burden on local property taxpayers. The local taxpayer will have not choice, but will be forced to subsidize those who are given a choice..