CHAPTER Env-Wq 2000 COASTAL PROGRAM GRANT RULES
REVISION NOTE:
Effective
July 1, 2004, Chapter 257:20 of the Laws of 2004 transferred Pln 900 Coastal Program Grant Rules from the Office of
Energy and Planning, formerly the Office of State Planning and Energy Programs,
to the Department of Environmental Services (Department). The Department subsequently filed Env-Ws 2000 in Document #8411, effective 8-19-05 which made
extensive changes to the numbering, wording, and format of Pln
900 and supersedes all prior filings for Pln
900. The prior filings affecting rules
in Pln 900 include the following:
#4526, eff 11-3-88 |
#5010, eff 11-27-90 |
#5509, eff 11-25-92 |
#6430, eff 1-18-97 |
#6610, eff 10-22-97 |
#7992, eff 12-1-03 |
This chapter was
subsequently redesignated editorially as Env-Wq 2000 pursuant to a rules reorganization plan for
Department rules approved by the Director of the Office of Legislative Services
on 9-7-05.
PART Env-Wq 2001 PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY
Env-Wq 2001.01 Purpose. The purpose of these rules is to establish
the procedures for applying for coastal program grants and the criteria for
evaluating the applications.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2001.02 Applicability. These rules shall apply to any applicant for
funding under the coastal program.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
PART Env-Wq 2002 DEFINITIONS
Env-Wq 2002.01
“Coastal zone” means the geographic boundary of the
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09 (from Env-Wq 2002.03)
Env-Wq 2002.02
“Department” means the department of environmental services.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09 (from Env-Wq 2002.04)
Env-Wq 2002.03
“Grant cycle” means one round of applications for funding.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09 (from Env-Wq 2002.05)
Env-Wq 2002.04 “New
Hampshire coastal program (NHCP)” means New Hampshire’s coastal management
program approved by NOAA under the federal Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA),
16 U.S.C. §§1451-1465, to enhance overall coastal resource management.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2002.05
“Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM)” means the
federal office within the NOAA National Ocean Service that interprets the CZMA.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09 (from Env-Wq 2002.06)
Env-Wq 2002.06
“Practicable" means available and capable of being done after
taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of
overall project purposes.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2002.07
“Section 306A project checklist” means the document provided by the OCRM
as part of its construction and acquisition requirements to be used in the
coastal grant program.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
PART Env-Wq 2003 LIMITATIONS ON GRANT DISTRIBUTION
Env-Wq 2003.01 Allocation
to Coastal States. In accordance
with the CZMA, funds are appropriated annually by Congress to OCRM to
distribute to coastal states with approved management programs. This chapter shall apply only to that portion
of the
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2003.02 Funding
Limits.
(a) A maximum of $50,000 financial assistance shall
be awarded to any applicant in any grant cycle.
(b) Each applicant shall submit no more than one
application in any grant cycle.
(c) Applications submitted by departments or
divisions within a larger governmental or educational entity shall be considered
as separate applications. However, no
single governmental or educational entity shall receive more than 50% of the
total available grant funds per grant cycle.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2003.03 Matching
Fund Requirements. Grantees shall
provide a non-federal funding match which, at a minimum, equals the grant
request, either with cash or in-kind services, unless at the time of the grant
request the federal matching requirement has been met.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2003.04 Eligible
Applicants. The following entities
shall be eligible to apply for a grant under this chapter:
(a) Any municipality, school district, regional
planning agency (RPA), or county government within or partially within the state’s
coastal zone;
(b) Academic institutions of higher education or
individual departments thereof;
(c) Any state agency; or
(d) Any tax exempt, non-profit organization as
certified by the United States Internal Revenue Service.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
PART Env-Wq 2004 GRANT APPLICATION PROCESS
Env-Wq 2004.01 Formal
Procedure. Applicants shall apply
for coastal program funds through a formal application procedure. Project applications shall contain the
information required in either Env-Wq 2004.04 or Env-Wq 2004.06,as appropriate, in order to be considered
for selection.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2004.02 Hearing
Requirement for Municipalities. If required by RSA 31:95-b, a municipal applicant
shall conduct a public hearing in accordance with that section. If a hearing is held, the municipality shall
provide written minutes of the hearing or town meeting in the application
materials.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2004.03 Planning/Management
Grants.
(a) Eligible planning or management activities
shall include the following:
(1) Preliminary
engineering reports and construction cost estimates;
(2) Feasibility
studies;
(3) Ordinance
development;
(4) Hydrologic
studies;
(5) Resource
planning and management studies;
(6) Mapping of
natural resources and land use;
(7) Invasive
species control;
(8) Resource
monitoring, research, and evaluation; and
(9) Education
and outreach.
(b) In order to be eligible for a
planning/management grant, projects shall meet each of the following minimum
requirements:
(1) Projects
shall be located within the coastal zone, or outside the coastal zone when
shown to directly affect the coastal zone; and
(2) Projects
shall not be dependent upon the need to complete other related work for which
there is no certainty of completion.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2004.04 Planning/Management
Grant Applications. The applicant
for a planning/ management grant shall provide the following:
(a) A concise narrative statement which
describes:
(1) The
proposed activity;
(2) Whether it
is a stand alone project or part of a larger project;
(3) Why the
project is necessary; and
(4) What the
outcome of the project will be;
(b) A map with the project location clearly
delineated;
(c) A schedule containing estimated dates for the
completion of specific project tasks;
(d) A budget that:
(1) Details all
costs and sources of funding associated with proposed project activities, as
well as a description of the source(s) of funding for the matching share; and
(2) Complies
with the following:
a. Not more
than 35% of total project costs shall be allowed as overhead or indirect costs;
and
b. Budgeted
amounts for volunteer services, if used as match, shall be detailed; and
(e) A description of how the proposal addresses
or does not address each of the selection criteria specified in Env-Wq 2006.03 through Env-Wq
2006.11.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2004.05 Construction/Acquisition
Grants.
(a) Construction, acquisition, and other projects
shall include the following:
(1) Acquisition
of interests in land, including but not limited to the fee, an easement, or a
right-of-way;
(2)
Construction projects;
(3) Habitat
restoration;
(4) Shoreline
rehabilitation and modification to increase or improve public access;
(5) Final
engineering designs or specifications; and
(6)
Educational, interpretive, and management activities.
(b) In order to be eligible for
construction/acquisition grants, projects shall meet each of the minimum
requirements for planning/management applications contained in Env-Wq 2004.03(b), and each of the following requirements,
as applicable to the project:
(1) Completed
projects shall be accessible for use by the general public, including persons
with disabilities;
(2)
Construction projects shall be sited on public land, leased land, or
land for which an easement has been obtained; and
(3) An easement
or lease shall be for the life of the constructed project.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2004.06 Construction/Acquisition
Grant Applications. The applicant
for a construction/ acquisition grant shall provide the following:
(a) A concise narrative statement which
describes:
(1) Each
activity proposed as part of the project;
(2) Whether it
is a stand alone project or is part of a larger
project;
(3) The
location of the project;
(4) Materials
to be used;
(5) Why the
project is necessary; and
(6) What the
end outcome of the project will be;
(b) A map with the exact project location and its
relationship to other surrounding features clearly delineated;
(c) A detailed site plan showing the relationship
of the project to other facilities and significant natural features, including
but not limited to slope, access points, wetlands, and dunes;
(d) If the project is a public access project, a
description of the signage proposed to identify its availability to the public;
(e) A schedule containing estimated dates for the
completion of specific project tasks;
(f) A budget that:
(1) Details all
costs and sources of funding associated with proposed project activities, as
well as a description of source of funding for the matching share; and
(2) Complies
with the following:
a. Not more
than 35% of total project costs shall be allowed as overhead or indirect costs;
and
b. Budgeted amounts
for volunteer services, if used as match, shall be detailed;
(g) For projects where the architectural and
engineering plans are final, a statement as to the source of funds for the
subsequent construction project;
(h) A title opinion, certification, affidavit, or
title insurance showing public ownership or control of land for projects
involving acquisition or construction, signed by a licensed attorney or
authorized state or local government official;
(i) A section 306A
project checklist to provide detailed information on potential environmental
impacts;
(j) For construction projects, a letter from the
state historic preservation officer clearing the project for historic
preservation purposes;
(k) A list of all necessary local, state, and
federal permits or a statement on the section 306A project checklist that no
permits are needed for the proposed project; and
(l) A description of how the proposal addresses
or does not address each of the selection criteria specified in Env-Wq 2006.03 through Env-Wq
2006.11.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2004.07 Multi-Phase
Projects.
(a) Multi-phase projects shall be eligible for
funding under this program, provided they meet all other requirements of these
rules.
(b) The award of a grant for one phase of a
multi-phase project shall not guarantee that subsequent phases will be
funded.
(c) Each phase of a project shall be:
(1) Completed
within one grant cycle; and
(2) Able to
stand alone as a project.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2004.08 Ineligible
Activities. The following activities
shall not be eligible for funding through the NHCP:
(a) Activities that do not fall within the
coastal zone, except as provided for in Env-Wq
2004.03(b)(1);
(b) Activities that are planned for
privately-owned land, except those which will be on privately-owned land with
public control through easement, right-of-way, or long-term lease; and
(c) Activities that otherwise are ineligible
under CZMA statutes and OCRM rules.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
PART Env-Wq 2005 PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF FUNDS BY
GRANTEE
Env-Wq 2005.01 Documentation.
(a) Grantees shall document all project activity
costs and associated costs.
(b) Documentation shall be available for review
by the department or OCRM.
(c) Grantees shall retain documentation for a
period of 3 years after project completion for audit purposes.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2005.02 Compliance
By Grantee With All Applicable Requirements. In performance of the project activities, the
grantee shall comply, and require each contractor and sub-contractor to comply
with:
(a) All statutes and rules governing the
administration of the NHCP;
(b) All applicable requirements of any federal,
state, county, or municipal authorities; and
(c) Any lawful directive of any public officer
relative to the performance of project activities.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
PART Env-Wq 2006 CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING &
APPROVING APPLICATIONS
Env-Wq 2006.01 Phase
1: Evaluating Applications Before Selection Process Begins.
(a) The department shall review each project
application to determine whether the application meets the minimum requirements
specified in Env-Wq 2004.03 or Env-Wq
2004.05.
(b) If the application meets the minimum
requirements, the department shall score the application as specified in Env-Wq 2006.02.
(c) If the application does not meet the minimum
requirements, the department shall notify the applicant that the application
has been rejected.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss
by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.02 Phase
2: Project Selection Process.
(a) Each application that meets the eligibility
requirements shall be evaluated and scored based on the criteria contained in Env-Wq 2006.03 through Env-Wq
2006.11.
(b) Eligible activities as identified in Env-Wq 2004.03 or Env-Wq 2004.05
shall be evaluated on the basis of the likely impact of the proposed project as
if it had been implemented.
(c) A minimum score of 26 points shall be
required for the NHCP to recommend the project to OCRM for final approval.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.03 Scoring
Based on Benefits to Focus Area.
(a) Each application shall be scored based on the
anticipated benefit of the proposed project in one of the following NHCP
project focus areas:
(1) Restoration
of coastal habitats;
(2) Water
quality and stormwater management;
(3) Land
conservation;
(4) Climate
change adaptation and coastal hazards; or
(5) Ocean and
estuarine resources.
(b) The NHCP shall determine whether a project:
(1) Directly
addresses one of the 5 focus areas set forth in (a), above, and, if so, whether
the project directly qualifies as a high or medium priority project based on
the criteria set forth in (c) and (d), below;
(2) Indirectly
addresses one of the 5 focus areas set forth in (a), above; or
(3) Does not
directly or indirectly address one of the 5 focus areas set forth in (a), above,
but is otherwise eligible for funding pursuant to Env-Wq
2004.03 through 2004.08.
(c) The following types of projects that directly
address one of the 5 focus areas shall qualify as high priority projects and
receive 10 points:
(1) Restoration
projects that:
a. Result in
restoration of tidal and non-tidal coastal habitats, including, rivers,
streams, and floodplains; or
b. Facilitate
the control of invasive species;
(2) Water
quality and stormwater management projects that:
a. Implement
low impact development technologies and practices;
b. Create and
promulgate water quality and stormwater ordinances;
or
c. Monitor the
effectiveness of water quality enhancement activities;
(3) Land
conservation projects that:
a. Conserve coastal
lands, including but not limited to buffers around tidal waters, tributary
rivers, and tributary streams;
b. Protect
floodplains;
c. Provide or
increase public access to coastal resources; or
d. Conserve
unique natural areas and habitats;
(4) Projects
that promote climate change adaptation and mitigation of coastal hazards by:
a. Planning and
modeling for sea level rise;
b. Implementing
actions to protect coastal infrastructure and resources; or
c. Promulgating
local regulations; or
(5) Projects
that protect ocean and estuarine resources, including but not limited to:
a. Renewable
energy siting research projects;
b. Dredged
material management projects;
c. Development of
offshore data sources such as bathymetry, benthic habitat and human uses; and
d. Projects
that implement innovative or regional approaches to offshore issues.
(d) The following types of projects that directly
address one of the 5 focus areas shall qualify as medium priority projects and
receive 6 points:
(1) Feasibility
studies, monitoring activities, and outreach associated with coastal habitat
restoration;
(2) Research,
ambient water quality monitoring, and outreach about the importance of good
water quality;
(3) Land
conservation outreach, planning, and stewardship;
(4) Research
and outreach pertaining to climate change adaptation and coastal hazards; or
(5) Marine
debris removal and prevention, and outreach on ocean and estuarine resources.
(e) A project that indirectly addresses one of
the 5 focus areas shall receive 4 points.
(f) A project that does not directly or
indirectly address one of the 5 focus areas but is otherwise eligible for
funding pursuant to Env-Wq 2004.03 through Env-Wq 2004.08 shall receive 2 points.
Source. (See Revision Note at chapter heading for Env-Wq 2000) #8411, eff 8-19-05; ss by #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.04 Scoring
Based on Completeness and Clarity.
Each application shall be scored on its completeness and clarity as
follows:
(a) An application shall be scored on its
executive summary as follows:
(1) An
application that includes a clear and descriptive executive summary shall
receive one point; and
(2) An
application that fails to include a clear and descriptive executive summary
shall receive no points;
(b) An application shall be scored on how well it
describes the purpose, objectives, and need for the proposed project as follows:
(1) An
application in which the purpose, objectives, and need for the proposed project
are clearly presented and which demonstrates direct applicability to NHCP focus
areas shall receive 4 points;
(2) An
application in which the purpose, objectives, and need for the proposed project
are not clearly described or which
demonstrates indirect applicability to NHCP focus areas shall receive 2
points; and
(3) An
application in which the purpose, objectives and need for the proposed project
are not clearly presented or which demonstrates no applicability to NHCP focus
areas shall receive no points;
(c) An application shall be scored on how well it
describes project tasks as follows:
(1) An application
in which project tasks are practicable and clearly described, and which
identifies who will complete each portion of the proposed work, shall receive 2
points; and
(2) An
application in which project tasks are not practicable, or clearly described,
or which does not identify who will complete each portion of the proposed work,
shall receive no points;
(d) An application shall be scored on its
inclusion of a project schedule as follows:
(1) An
application that includes a clear implementation plan with dates for completion
of project milestones that are achievable within the allotted time period shall
receive 2 points; and
(2) An
application that does not include a clear implementation plan with dates for
completion of project milestones that are achievable within the allotted time
period shall receive no points;
(e) An application shall be scored on its
inclusion of a budget and matching fund justification as follows:
(1) An
application in which the budget and matching fund justification are complete
and practicable based on the stated objectives, tasks, and time frame shall
receive 3 points; and
(2) An
application in which the budget and matching fund justification are not
complete and practicable based on the stated objectives, tasks, and time frames
shall receive no points;
(f) An application shall be scored on how well it
describes anticipated project outcomes as follows:
(1) An
application that describes specific, tangible results that are consistent with
the project objectives shall receive 3 points; and
(2) An
application that does not describe specific, tangible results that are
consistent with the project objectives shall receive no points;
(g) An application shall be scored on how well it
measures success as follows:
(1) An
application that includes an assessment strategy that will effectively measure
results and completion of the project objectives shall receive 2 points; and
(2) An
application that does not include an assessment strategy that will effectively measure
results and completion of the project objectives shall receive no points; and
(h) An application shall be scored on its
inclusion of all submission requirements as follows:
(1) An
application that includes all application submission requirements set forth in Env-Wq 2004.04 or Env-Wq
2004.06,as applicable, shall receive 2 points; and
(2) An
application that does not include all application submission requirements set
forth in Env-Wq 2004.04 or Env-Wq
2004.06, as applicable, shall receive no points.
Source. #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.05 Scoring
Based on Consistency with Needs.
Each application shall be scored on the project’s consistency with the
needs identified in federal, state, regional, or local plans or studies as
follows:
(a) A project need that is specifically
identified by one or more federal, state, regional, or local plans or studies
shall receive 3 points;
(b) A project need that is generally supported in
concept by 2 or more federal, state, regional, or local plans or studies shall
receive 2 points;
(c) A project need that is generally supported in
concept by one federal, state, regional, or local plan or study shall receive
one point; and
(d) A project that has no documented need shall
receive no points.
Source. #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.06 Scoring
Based on Volunteer Involvement. Each
application shall be scored on the project’s inclusion of volunteer involvement
as follows:
(a) A project in which volunteers will contribute
more than 50 percent of the time and effort for the project shall receive 2
points;
(b) A project in which volunteers will contribute
some but less than 50 percent of the time and effort for the project shall
receive one point; and
(c) A project in which there is no volunteer
involvement shall receive no points.
Source. #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.07 Scoring
Based on Increase in Understanding.
Each application shall be scored on how the project will increase the
understanding of coastal issues and lead to behavior change that will
positively impact the coast as follows:
(a) A project in which the primary purpose is
outreach and education, with clearly defined target audiences and strategies to
reach those audiences, and that incorporates direct hands-on outreach and
education, such as trainings, field events, and workshops, shall receive 3
points;
(b) A project with clearly defined target
audiences and strategies to reach those audiences, that incorporates indirect
outreach and education, such as brochures, Internet materials and web sites,
mass media campaigns, and interpretive kiosks and/or signage, shall receive 2
points;
(c) A project that does not define target
audiences and outreach strategies, but incorporates an indirect education and
outreach component shall receive one point; and
(d) A project that does not incorporate an
outreach and education component shall receive no points.
Source. #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.08 Scoring
Based on Opportunities for Cooperation.
Each application shall be scored on whether the project will improve
opportunities for multi-entity cooperation on coastal resource planning and
management efforts as follows:
(a) A project that involves cooperation between 4
or more coastal stakeholders, where stakeholders are identified as any entity
that is eligible to receive grant funding pursuant to Env-Wq
2003.04, shall receive 3 points;
(b) A project that involves cooperation between 2
or 3 coastal stakeholders shall receive 2 points; and
(c) A project that does not involve multi-entity
cooperation shall receive no points.
Source. #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.09 Scoring
Based on Receipt of Prior Grants and Past Performance.
(a) Each application shall be scored on whether
the applicant is a new applicant to the NHCP as follows:
(1) A project
proposed by an applicant that has not received NHCP grant funding in the 10
years immediately prior to the current grant round shall receive 4 points; and
(2) A project
proposed by an applicant that has received NHCP grant funding in the 10 years
immediately prior to the current grant round shall receive no points.
(b) For projects proposed by applicants who have
received NHCP funding in the 10 years immediately prior to the current grant
round, the application shall be scored on the previous performance of the
applicant as follows:
(1) A project
shall receive 4 points if all the following apply:
a. Work
products were complete and finished on time;
b. Interim
reports were clear and descriptive and submitted on time; and
c. Invoices
were submitted on time and were error-free;
(2) A project
shall receive 2 points if one of the following circumstances occurred:
a. Work products
were complete but finished late;
b. Interim
reports were not clear and descriptive or were submitted late; or
c. Invoices
were submitted late or contained multiple errors;
(3) A project shall
receive one point if 2 of the following circumstances occurred:
a. Work
products were incomplete or finished late;
b. Interim
reports were not clear and descriptive or were submitted late; or
c. Invoices
were submitted late or contained multiple errors; and
(4) A project
shall receive no points if all of the following circumstances occurred:
a. Work
products were incomplete or finished late;
b. Interim
reports were not clear and descriptive or were submitted late; and
c. Invoices were
submitted late or contained multiple errors.
Source. #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.10 Scoring
Based on Support for the Project.
Each application shall be scored on whether the project has documented
support, as follows:
(a) To receive 3 points, a project shall be
supported by 3 affected communities, groups, or organizations submitting a
letter that:
(1)
Specifically identifies the proposed project; and
(2) Is dated
within one year prior to the grant application;
(b) To receive 2 points, a project shall be
supported by 2 affected communities, groups, or organizations submitting a
letter that:
(1)
Specifically identifies the proposed project; and
(2) Is dated within
one year prior to the grant application;
(c) To receive one point, a project shall be
supported by one affected community, group, or organization submitting a letter
that:
(1)
Specifically identifies the proposed project; and
(2) Is dated
within one year prior to the grant application; and
(d) A project that does not qualify for points
under (1), (2), or (3), above, shall receive no points.
Source. #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.11 Scoring
Based on Excess Match. Each project
shall be scored on its inclusion of matching funds or in-kind services in
excess of the required match amount, as follows:
(a) A project for which the applicant will
provide $50,000 or more in excess non-federal matching funds shall receive 6
points;
(b) A project for which the applicant will
provide at least $40,000 but less than $50,000 in excess non-federal matching
funds shall receive 5 points;
(c) A project for which the applicant will
provide at least $30,000 but less than $40,000 in excess non-federal matching
funds shall receive 4 points;
(d) A project for which the applicant will
provide at least $20,000, but less than $30,000 in excess non-federal matching
funds shall receive 3 points;
(e) A project for which the applicant will provide
at least $10,000, but less than $20,000 in excess non-federal matching funds
shall receive 2 points;
(f) A project for which the applicant will
provide at least $5,000 but less than $10,000
in excess non-federal matching funds shall receive one point; and
(g) A project for which the applicant will
provide less than $5,000 in excess non-federal matching funds shall receive no
points.
Source. #9570, eff 10-17-09
Env-Wq 2006.12 Phase
3: Recommendation to OCRM.
(a) After all eligible projects have been scored,
the department shall recommend those projects which best meet the selection
criteria, as demonstrated by the total number of points, to OCRM for funding.
(b) In accordance with grant conditions of NOAA,
OCRM shall have final approval authority for all projects.
Source. #9570, eff 10-17-09 (from Env-Wq 2006.03)
APPENDIX A:
STATUTES IMPLEMENTED
Rule Section(s) |
State Statute(s) Implemented |
Federal Statute(s)/Regulation(s) Implemented |
Env-Wq 2000 (see also specific section below |
RSA 4-C:1, II(i); RSA
21-O:3, IV |
16 USC 1455; 15 CFR 24 |
Env-Wq 2001 |
RSA 4-C:1, II(i); RSA 21-O:3, IV |
16 USC 1455; 15 CFR 24 |
Env-Wq 2002 |
RSA 4-C:1, II(i); RSA 21-O:3, IV |
16 USC 1455; 15 CFR 24 |
Env-Wq 2003 |
RSA 4-C:1, II(i); RSA 21-O:3, IV |
16 USC 1455; 15 CFR 24 |
Env-Wq 2004 (see also specific section below) |
RSA 4-C:1, II(i); RSA
21-O:3, IV |
16 USC 1455; 15 CFR 24 |
Env-Wq 2004.02 |
RSA 31:95-b |
|
Env-Wq 2005 |
RSA 4-C:1, II(i); RSA 21-O:3, IV |
16 USC 1455; 15 CFR 24 |
Env-Wq 2006 |
RSA 4-C:1, II(i); RSA 21-O:3, IV |
16 USC 1455; 15 CFR 24 |
Appendix B: RSA 489-C
RSA 489-C Salt
Applicator Certification Option
RSA 489-C:1 Definitions. In this
chapter:
II.
“Commercial applicator” means any individual who applies or supervises
others who apply salt, but shall not include municipal or state employees.
V.
“Salt” means sodium chloride, calcium chloride, magnesium chloride, or
any other substance containing chloride.
VI.
“Salt alternative” means any substance not containing chloride used for
the purpose of de-icing or anti-icing.
RSA 489-C:2 Certification Option. Commercial
applicators may elect to be annually certified by the department. Applicator certificates shall be issued by the
department. Any business that employs multiple commercial applicators may
obtain a master certificate for the owner or chief supervisor, and commercial
applicators employed by the business may obtain certificates to qualify under
the master certificate. Any business
holding a master certificate shall ensure that all commercial applicators
operating under its master certificate receive the required training and shall
provide the required recordkeeping on behalf of all commercial applicators. Annual fees for certificates obtained under a
master certificate shall be significantly less than the fees for a master
certificate.
RSA 489-C:3 Rulemaking Authority. The
commissioner shall adopt rules pursuant to RSA 541-A, relative to:
I.
Policies and goals for applying salt.
II.
Receiving and allocating federal grants and other funds or gifts for the
purpose of carrying out any of the provisions of this chapter.
IV.
Procedures for commercial applicators to obtain certification.
V. Recordkeeping
required for commercial applicators to maintain certification.
VI.
Establishing and collecting fees to cover the cost of program implementation.
RSA 489-C:4 Application for
Certification. Applications for certification shall be on a
form prescribed by the department and shall include the following:
I. The
full name and address of the person applying for the certification.
II.
The name and address of a person whose domicile is in the state, and who
is authorized to receive and accept service of summons and legal notices of all
kinds for the applicant.
IV.
Any other information deemed necessary by the department.
RSA 489-C:5 Administration and
Enforcement.
I. The
commissioner shall administer and enforce the provisions of this chapter.
II.
The department may issue an order to any person who is in violation of
any provision of this chapter, an applicator certificate issued under this
chapter, or a rule adopted under this chapter, to cease and desist from any act
in violation of such provision, certification, or rule. Orders of the
department under this section shall be effective immediately.
IV. There is hereby established a salt
application fund. This nonlapsing fund shall be
continually appropriated to the department and used to administer the salt
applicator certification program under this chapter. Certification fees
collected by the department shall be deposited with the state treasurer to the
credit of such fund and may be invested as provided by law. Interest received
on such investment shall also be credited to the fund. No funds from the
general fund shall be used to cover the cost of the salt applicator
certification program.
Appendix C: Other Relevant Statutes
RSA 508:22 New Section; Liability Limited for Winter
Maintenance.
I. No
commercial applicator as defined in RSA 489-C:1, II and certified under RSA
489-C:2, or owner, occupant, or lessee of land whose premises is maintained by
a commercial applicator certified under RSA 489-C:2, shall be liable for
damages arising from insufficiencies or hazards on any premises owned,
occupied, maintained, or operated by them, even with actual notice thereof,
when such hazards are caused solely by snow or ice, and the commercial
applicator’s, owner’s, occupant’s, or lessee’s failure or delay in removing or
mitigating such hazards is the result of its implementation, absent gross
negligence or reckless disregard of the hazard, of best management practices
for winter road, parking lot, and sidewalk maintenance adopted and published by
the department of transportation and the department of environmental services. All commercial applicators, owners, occupants,
or lessees who adopt such best management practices shall be presumed to be
acting pursuant to the best management practices in the absence of proof to the
contrary.
II. In
order to receive the liability protection provided in paragraph I, a commercial
applicator as defined in RSA 489-C:1, II, or an owner, occupant, or lessee of
land shall keep a written record describing its winter road, parking lot and
property maintenance practices. The
written record shall include the type and rate of application of de-icing
materials used, the dates of treatment, and the weather conditions for each
event requiring de-icing. Such records shall be kept for a period of 3 years.